Porous “Blanket” Scores a Hole in One at Patriot Hills
The irrigated bent grass fairways traverse 6,600 yd. of hilly terrain and are surrounded by Kentucky bluegrass primary roughs and fescue buffalo grass secondary roughs. Elsewhere, numerous rock walls, exposed during construction, accent the landscape, which offers views of the Hudson River in several locations.“There’s a lot of elevation change throughout the course,” describes Joe Smyth, CGCS, superintendent of Patriot Hills. “On four holes, it changes 100 feet or more from tee to green. The degree of slope is three-to-one or steeper on at least half of the fairways and even steeper on the roughs. Some of the slopes are as long as 150 yards. Erosion was a major concern in building the course.” The easily dispersed clay particles in the clay-loam soils added to this concern. So did the water features: a pond on one hole and a total of about 4 ac. of wetlands around two other holes. In all, about 20 ac. of slopes on fairways, roughs, and areas around greens, tees, and bunkers at Patriot Hills call for measures to limit sediment loss due to runoff.When it comes to controlling erosion, grass and other vegetation are naturals. Leaves and stems absorb the energy and soften the erosive impact of raindrops, reduce the amount of runoff by intercepting it to infiltrate into the ground, and slow the flow of runoff to promote sediment deposition. Meanwhile the root systems help anchor the soil.Because of the slope lengths and gradients at Patriot Hills, covering seeded slopes with loose straw or hydromulch would have been ineffective in controlling erosion. On a previous golf course construction project, Smyth installed sod to establish a quick, permanent protective cover. But for this project, costs of sod exceeded the erosion control budget. Rolled erosion control blankets were another option. In addition to the labor required to install the blankets, staples used to secure them must be removed later. Also, depending on the type of product, netting can interfere with mowing. In fact, erosion control blankets were installed on several small areas early in this project. However, the expense of covering all the critical slopes ruled out this alternative.Smyth examined a less costly approach, one he had never used. He tested two different brands of spray-on erosion control products. One was a conventional bonded fiber matrix (BFM).“Compared to the other choices, we felt it was the most cost-effective way to achieve quick germination and control erosion,” he explains.“Material and installation costs of the product are about half those of sod,” says Dick Grant. His company, Chesapeake Turf LLC in Salisbury, MD, handled the seeding and erosion control work on the project. As he points out, the porous blanket allows turf to grow up through the matrix of fiber and conforms closely to humps, dips, and other surface irregularities for maximum soil protection.